I'm still not convinced I have at all distorted the statement Indeed, everything Only convinces me of the rightness of my reading. Perhaps I might have better avoided talking about their intentions and merely discussed the ideological positions that are suspended as it were, within the text. My deduction a rather elementary one I think. If I had it to write over again, I would probably put in something how problematic though it is Where I first set out some of these ideas I wrote the following: "sad non-communication" I like Jameson's account of utopia. I don't think I necessarily get a pass here. I don't have all of the answers The answers I do have are likely to be wrong. As I said in the comments below I don't feel that this point is well-understood. This focus on distribution strikes me as the kind of position that somebody like me is much more likely to take Trust me, no one will be happier than me Whether you think I'm right At least it matters to me